<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First thoughts on litl&#8217;s Easel.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alexhudson.com/2009/10/28/first-thoughts-on-litls-easel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alexhudson.com/2009/10/28/first-thoughts-on-litls-easel/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:12:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Hudson: litl breaks cover &#8211; what to think? &#124; TuxWire : The Linux Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.alexhudson.com/2009/10/28/first-thoughts-on-litls-easel/comment-page-1/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Hudson: litl breaks cover &#8211; what to think? &#124; TuxWire : The Linux Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexhudson.com/blog/?p=232#comment-288</guid>
		<description>[...] litl has finally broken cover &#8211; I had written previously some first thoughts based on the various tid-bits that had leaked, and I thought it might be interesting to follow up [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] litl has finally broken cover &#8211; I had written previously some first thoughts based on the various tid-bits that had leaked, and I thought it might be interesting to follow up [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: litl breaks cover - what to think? &#171; Alex&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.alexhudson.com/2009/10/28/first-thoughts-on-litls-easel/comment-page-1/#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>litl breaks cover - what to think? &#171; Alex&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexhudson.com/blog/?p=232#comment-286</guid>
		<description>[...] litl has finally broken cover - I had written previously some first thoughts based on the various tid-bits that had leaked, and I thought it might be interesting to follow up [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] litl has finally broken cover &#8211; I had written previously some first thoughts based on the various tid-bits that had leaked, and I thought it might be interesting to follow up [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Hudson: First thoughts on litl’s Easel. &#124; TuxWire : The Linux Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.alexhudson.com/2009/10/28/first-thoughts-on-litls-easel/comment-page-1/#comment-257</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Hudson: First thoughts on litl’s Easel. &#124; TuxWire : The Linux Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexhudson.com/blog/?p=232#comment-257</guid>
		<description>[...] here to read the rest:  Alex Hudson: First thoughts on litl’s Easel.   Share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] here to read the rest:  Alex Hudson: First thoughts on litl’s Easel.   Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.alexhudson.com/2009/10/28/first-thoughts-on-litls-easel/comment-page-1/#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexhudson.com/blog/?p=232#comment-256</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s potentially relevant. The problem is, if you&#039;re sticking this into your TV, there usually would need to be a good reason: I don&#039;t believe that &quot;showing photos off Flikr&quot; is a terribly good reason. The basic question is, &quot;Why would I plug this into a TV?&quot;.

I have no problem with the HDMI being an option; I just don&#039;t see the use case. Internet video is about the only possibility I can think of, but (at least in the UK) you probably have better equipment than this thing to play that stuff back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s potentially relevant. The problem is, if you&#8217;re sticking this into your TV, there usually would need to be a good reason: I don&#8217;t believe that &#8220;showing photos off Flikr&#8221; is a terribly good reason. The basic question is, &#8220;Why would I plug this into a TV?&#8221;.</p>
<p>I have no problem with the HDMI being an option; I just don&#8217;t see the use case. Internet video is about the only possibility I can think of, but (at least in the UK) you probably have better equipment than this thing to play that stuff back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HUb</title>
		<link>http://www.alexhudson.com/2009/10/28/first-thoughts-on-litls-easel/comment-page-1/#comment-255</link>
		<dc:creator>HUb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexhudson.com/blog/?p=232#comment-255</guid>
		<description>HDMI is the new video connector standard. It is like having a RCA jack for composite video, but in better.

FWIW, I have more HDMI input on my TV than analog composite video.

So DVD or not it is still very relevant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HDMI is the new video connector standard. It is like having a RCA jack for composite video, but in better.</p>
<p>FWIW, I have more HDMI input on my TV than analog composite video.</p>
<p>So DVD or not it is still very relevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
