<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thunderbird: Fedora &amp; the future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alexhudson.com/2010/04/25/thunderbird-fedora-the-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alexhudson.com/2010/04/25/thunderbird-fedora-the-future/</link>
	<description>world of alex hudson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 19:36:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed DeWan</title>
		<link>http://www.alexhudson.com/2010/04/25/thunderbird-fedora-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-479</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed DeWan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 06:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexhudson.com/?p=348#comment-479</guid>
		<description>Thunderbird&#039;s address book is a horrible pain in the butt!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thunderbird&#8217;s address book is a horrible pain in the butt!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm</title>
		<link>http://www.alexhudson.com/2010/04/25/thunderbird-fedora-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-403</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexhudson.com/?p=348#comment-403</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately Evolution (for me on linux) is not an option due to completely unstable ldap implementation.
This has been around for at least 5 years and has no sign of ever been fixed.
At the moment kmail is the only option available to anyone that I am aware of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately Evolution (for me on linux) is not an option due to completely unstable ldap implementation.<br />
This has been around for at least 5 years and has no sign of ever been fixed.<br />
At the moment kmail is the only option available to anyone that I am aware of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.alexhudson.com/2010/04/25/thunderbird-fedora-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 06:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexhudson.com/?p=348#comment-401</guid>
		<description>Bucky - totally agree about the LDAP stuff. It&#039;s a really basic pain point for organisations that there&#039;s no out-of-the-box sharing story for the address book.

I know they talk about the functionality of the various add-ons, but honestly I really wouldn&#039;t want to trust what I consider &quot;core&quot; functionality to an &quot;added extra&quot; which wasn&#039;t being maintained by the same people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bucky &#8211; totally agree about the LDAP stuff. It&#8217;s a really basic pain point for organisations that there&#8217;s no out-of-the-box sharing story for the address book.</p>
<p>I know they talk about the functionality of the various add-ons, but honestly I really wouldn&#8217;t want to trust what I consider &#8220;core&#8221; functionality to an &#8220;added extra&#8221; which wasn&#8217;t being maintained by the same people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance Haig</title>
		<link>http://www.alexhudson.com/2010/04/25/thunderbird-fedora-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-399</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance Haig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 20:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexhudson.com/?p=348#comment-399</guid>
		<description>I can only say that Thunderbird 3 can not be used if you get large amounts of mail per day. I don&#039;t think it scales well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can only say that Thunderbird 3 can not be used if you get large amounts of mail per day. I don&#8217;t think it scales well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bucky</title>
		<link>http://www.alexhudson.com/2010/04/25/thunderbird-fedora-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-398</link>
		<dc:creator>Bucky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 19:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexhudson.com/?p=348#comment-398</guid>
		<description>If you evaluate Evolution on Windows, I&#039;d be really interested to know what you conclude. I looked at it a couple years ago, and it wasn&#039;t ready, stability-wise.

What frustrates me about Thunderbird is their man-in-a-tower development history. They&#039;ve got a 9-year feature request LDAP read/write capability (shared address books being an enterprise REQUIREMENT), and they screw around playing peek-a-boo with the &quot;reply&quot; button search folders. I&#039;d call that misplaced priorities.

The reason I&#039;m so frustrated with Thunderbird is that it&#039;s otherwise a FANTASTIC email client. But it&#039;s lack of any kind of address book collaboration is a complete show-stopper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you evaluate Evolution on Windows, I&#8217;d be really interested to know what you conclude. I looked at it a couple years ago, and it wasn&#8217;t ready, stability-wise.</p>
<p>What frustrates me about Thunderbird is their man-in-a-tower development history. They&#8217;ve got a 9-year feature request LDAP read/write capability (shared address books being an enterprise REQUIREMENT), and they screw around playing peek-a-boo with the &#8220;reply&#8221; button search folders. I&#8217;d call that misplaced priorities.</p>
<p>The reason I&#8217;m so frustrated with Thunderbird is that it&#8217;s otherwise a FANTASTIC email client. But it&#8217;s lack of any kind of address book collaboration is a complete show-stopper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

