Category: bongo (Page 7 of 9)
There’s nothing which divides hackers so much as HTML as a format for sending mail. However, a recent discussion on another mailing list makes me think that there is hope for it.
I should state up-front that I’m very much in favour of HTML as a mail format. I outlined a couple of the technical reasons why in my posting on the subject, but it can be summarised mainly to:
For a while, I’ve been intending to put a list of inspirational articles on our wiki. Not really so much that I think everyone should read them – though I think they’re all worthwhile reading – more so that I can find them again when I think about them. Of course, the last time I actually remembered I wanted to do this and had some spare time, the wiki was down.
It has been a little while in the making, and the construction signs are still up, but we’re almost there. After our community IRC meeting earlier this month, we decided that the uncertainty was a problem, and Bongo is the result.
I think this is working out well for a few reasons. We’ve seen more activity and participation this month than I think probably in the previous six or more beforehand.
Sorry – another slightly technical post. This is yet again another visit to the subject of locking, which I briefly described the problems with a while ago, and then wrote some new code to help alleviate the problems.
One thing I didn’t explain at all, looking back at those posts, is the different reasons for locking. We can simplify this down to two major reasons:
Internal database consistency. SQL databases are usually “ACID compliant“, and SQLite is no different.
Well, it was last weekend, but I meant to write about it before now. It was nice to have probably the biggest meet-up of Bongo Project contributors that has ever happened, and Project polo shirts are now in the hands of everyone. The weekend was mostly spent looking through the talk schedule (some of which was interesting, some of which was less so), wondering if Nat was going to say anything about Hula, and chatting about Bongo – we didn’t go to too many talks, but the Selenium one was probably worth the weekend alone.
Actually Andrew, we didn’t do a BOF last year: I did a talk (which was sadly moved at the last minute, and didn’t get as many people as I hoped it would), and me and Seb P. had a chinwag, but we didn’t have a proper BOF.
So I’m thinking this year we should definitely do a BOF. Whether or not we apply for a talking slot, I don’t know – I think we have a lot more to talk about this year, particularly about community transition and perhaps release management 🙂 – but I don’t know to what extent it will be different to the other stuff they will have going on.
Since my last techie post on locks was appreciated and since I’m still crook, here comes another one. Again, the focus on making Thunderbird work better with Bongo was the main aim – after my locking changes, I found that we ran into a whole new set of problems: mostly, that the IMAP agent wasn’t responding in a timely manner.
So, my next step was to address the progress reporting with a small new piece of code which sits in the various command loops inside the IMAP agent.
I haven’t blogged about Bongo for ages, and this is something I’ve thought about writing a few times – but mostly didn’t for fear of taking attention off the more practical stuff, like getting rid of MDB.
But, it seems timely to get some of this stuff out of my brain. First, go and watch Inbox Zero: it’s an hour of your time, but it’s worth it, and I think it’s as seminal for Bongo as JWZ’s Bad Groupware essay was for Hula.
Sebastian has been working hard on logos and templates and things – we don’t want Bongo to lose visual appeal. While others are working on code, Jonny, Dejan, Michel et. al. have been working on web content and it’s all beginning to come together.
You’ll have noticed the new theme being gradually worked in on the planet and the wiki, and the login page for Bongo has changed:
Michel is hoping to arrange something for the forum soon.
So, the efforts of the past few weeks have started to bear fruit. Part of this has been checked into SVN, some will be checked in later today, but we’re definitely beginning to get there.
I thought it would be interesting to look at the problem from the point of view of what the code is doing now. If you recall, the basic problem is this: we want to run an SQL query against our data to return a list of documents, but we then want to be able to refine the data on a number of different criteria.
